Is Organic Really Better for You? What the Studies Actually Say
Pesticide residues, antioxidants, cadmium: the most cited meta-analyses, what they confirm, what they do not, and why this is not only about health.
In depth · 3 min read
In food, ‘organic’ is a regulated word. In cosmetics it is not — here is what changes, and what a certification such as ICEA actually guarantees.
On a jar of honey the word “organic” has a precise, verifiable, enforceable meaning. On a face cream, it does not. It is a difference almost nobody knows about, and it changes entirely how a cosmetic label should be read.
For food there is European organic legislation: it defines what may be done in the field, imposes periodic controls, and assigns a code to the body that verifies. The code on our food products, IT BIO 006, comes from that system and is traceable back to the operator.
For cosmetics, that legislation does not exist. The European cosmetics regulation governs safety, permitted ingredients, labelling and liability, but it does not establish what may call itself “organic” or “natural”. Those two words, on their own, are not guaranteed by any law.
In practice it can mean many different things, all of them legitimate because none is prohibited. A product with 2% plant extract and 98% synthetic ingredients can call itself natural without breaking any rule. The same goes for flower imagery, green packaging, and words like “pure”.
This does not mean everyone is lying. It means the word alone tells you nothing, and you need another source to tell products apart.
Precisely because the law is silent, private standards with their own specifications have grown up. ICEA is one of them, alongside others recognised across Europe. A certifying body does what the law does not require: it sets a minimum share of naturally derived ingredients, prohibits specific categories of substances, verifies the supply chain and repeats its checks over time.
It is not an absolute guarantee, and not all standards ask for the same things. But it is the difference between a word chosen by the seller and a check carried out by a third party, and that difference is substantial.
The one genuinely regulated list on a cosmetic package is the INCI, the ingredient list in international nomenclature. It is compulsory, standardised across the European Union, and ordered by decreasing quantity down to 1%.
Honey, beeswax, propolis and royal jelly have appeared in natural cosmetics for centuries, and in the INCI they have precise names: mel, cera alba, propolis, royal jelly. They are of animal origin, therefore not vegan, which is worth knowing if that is a criterion for you.
They are also a good test of everything above: checking where they sit in the INCI tells you whether they are really the heart of the formula or only the theme of the packaging.
In cosmetics the word “organic” is not protected the way it is in food. What you can verify is the presence of a certification with a public specification and a third-party body, and your own reading of the INCI. Everything else is communication: legitimate, but not a guarantee.
Keep reading
Pesticide residues, antioxidants, cadmium: the most cited meta-analyses, what they confirm, what they do not, and why this is not only about health.
Hives within three kilometres of organic crops, no antibiotics in the colony, treatments only with organic acids. Then the data: cough, wounds, antioxidants.
There is no single answer: what vegan organisations say, what those who disagree argue, and how to read a label and judge for yourself.
Our newsletter
News from our shop, straight to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.